Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 43657 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Kitchen Set Warna Hitam Terdekat Magelang Utara Magelang.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 43657 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Kitchen Set Warna Hitam Terdekat Magelang Utara Magelang.
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
accepted. The court in Gallion, while reaffirming the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
accepted. The court in Gallion, while reaffirming the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary, recognized “a greater need to articulate on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary, recognized “a greater need to articulate on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hough indicated to the court throughout the colloquy that he understood the information set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
. Hough indicated to the court throughout the colloquy that he understood the information set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by evaluating Jennifer’s motion according to the standard for custody modifications set forth in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
by evaluating Jennifer’s motion according to the standard for custody modifications set forth in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
Annette B. Brudnowski v. John M. Brudnowski
the amount due her under the child support formulas authorized in § 767.25(1j), Stats., and set forth in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11971 - 2005-03-31
the amount due her under the child support formulas authorized in § 767.25(1j), Stats., and set forth in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11971 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
. 1989). The issue of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
. 1989). The issue of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
State v. William J. Ludwig
as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
potential error would not constitute a new factor. ¶4 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66789 - 2011-06-27
potential error would not constitute a new factor. ¶4 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66789 - 2011-06-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶37-38. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶37-38. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William J. Ludwig
for substantial battery as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15313 - 2017-09-21
for substantial battery as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15313 - 2017-09-21