Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 29419 for er.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 29419 for er.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in denying his motions asking for discharge from his Chapter 980 commitment. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82788 - 2014-09-15
court erred in denying his motions asking for discharge from his Chapter 980 commitment. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82788 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his claim was barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28884 - 2007-06-26
relief. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his claim was barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28884 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
-claims case. The crux of his contention is that the circuit court erred in determining that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30224 - 2014-09-15
-claims case. The crux of his contention is that the circuit court erred in determining that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Brown argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000993 - 2025-08-26
counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Brown argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000993 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this issue. The no-merit report discusses whether the circuit court erred by denying Christophel’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
to this issue. The no-merit report discusses whether the circuit court erred by denying Christophel’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
CA Blank Order
erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas without an evidentiary hearing. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas without an evidentiary hearing. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
State v. Leroy W. Senn
that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to adjourn the jury trial; (2) admitting Senn’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4669 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to adjourn the jury trial; (2) admitting Senn’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4669 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the 2007 video warrants a new trial in the interest of justice; (3) the trial court erred in allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99009 - 2013-07-08
of the 2007 video warrants a new trial in the interest of justice; (3) the trial court erred in allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99009 - 2013-07-08
Lori Bell v. Mae Neugart
to Neugart. She contends the court erred in interpreting Wis. Stat. § 885.16 (1999-2000),[2] the dead man’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4397 - 2005-03-31
to Neugart. She contends the court erred in interpreting Wis. Stat. § 885.16 (1999-2000),[2] the dead man’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4397 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 14
(“Deutsche Bank”). 1 On appeal, the Olsons argue that the trial court erred in admitting certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158102 - 2017-09-21
(“Deutsche Bank”). 1 On appeal, the Olsons argue that the trial court erred in admitting certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158102 - 2017-09-21