Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 69076 for he.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 69076 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues: (1) his trial attorney was ineffective; (2) his convictions violate double jeopardy; (3) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87974 - 2014-09-15
argues: (1) his trial attorney was ineffective; (2) his convictions violate double jeopardy; (3) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his defense counsel2 was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515867 - 2022-05-03
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his defense counsel2 was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515867 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
A. Willick appeals from a judgment of conviction. He claims the evidence presented at his court trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367376 - 2021-05-19
A. Willick appeals from a judgment of conviction. He claims the evidence presented at his court trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367376 - 2021-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing when he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
.[2] Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing when he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
5, 2015, he pled guilty as charged to the misdemeanor and guilty as charged to one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
5, 2015, he pled guilty as charged to the misdemeanor and guilty as charged to one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Gustavo Espino
identifiable crime which he allegedly conspired to commit. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On April 10, 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12575 - 2017-09-21
identifiable crime which he allegedly conspired to commit. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On April 10, 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Carlson
939.62(1)(c). 1 He contends that one of the jurors could not understand English sufficiently to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3895 - 2017-09-20
939.62(1)(c). 1 He contends that one of the jurors could not understand English sufficiently to serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3895 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael W. Carlson
, as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 939.62(1)(c).[1] He contends that one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3895 - 2005-03-31
, as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 939.62(1)(c).[1] He contends that one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” It also stated, “He did not acknowledge any functional deficits except to admit some difficulty related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
.” It also stated, “He did not acknowledge any functional deficits except to admit some difficulty related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2017-18)1 original and supplemental postconviction motions. He argues that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236820 - 2019-03-13
(2017-18)1 original and supplemental postconviction motions. He argues that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236820 - 2019-03-13