Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 49879 for our.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 49879 for our.
CA Blank Order
in accepting Darrah’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
in accepting Darrah’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed. Based upon our review of the No. 2016AP1556 2 briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
imposed. Based upon our review of the No. 2016AP1556 2 briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101774 - 2013-09-09
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101774 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Felipe R. Domenech
and I won it. It was something Guillermito and I did and, and by our clothes … and they caught us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21
and I won it. It was something Guillermito and I did and, and by our clothes … and they caught us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Delao
be frivolous. Attorney Skemp concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9159 - 2017-09-19
be frivolous. Attorney Skemp concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9159 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of our supreme court’s decision in State v. Jenich, 94 Wis. 2d 74, 288 N.W.2d 114 (1980) (on motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
of our supreme court’s decision in State v. Jenich, 94 Wis. 2d 74, 288 N.W.2d 114 (1980) (on motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12