Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 46325 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Trentt O. Kinison
that the trial court erred in allowing into evidence the breathalyzer and radar test results and that without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7453 - 2017-09-20

State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
under a balancing test, where the potential harm to society that Schulpius’s release might cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20871 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
than four years, such confinement was ultimately justified under a balancing test, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20871 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presided over his trial and sentencing was objectively biased because that judge worked in the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190182 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marshall R. Reese
erroneous standard). Simply put, the taillights could have been both working when tested and not working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Marshall R. Reese
standard). Simply put, the taillights could have been both working when tested and not working when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21

State v. Timothy R. Stankus
did not ask Stankus what the substance was, and he did not open the bag or conduct any field testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy R. Stankus
Stankus what the substance was, and he did not open the bag or conduct any field testing to identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12782 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Stephanie M.W.
education class for emotionally, not cognitively, disturbed students. While working one-on- one with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6319 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
% of the prison wages and work release funds. Restitution shall be paid pursuant to separate court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187352 - 2017-09-21