Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3781 - 3790 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time limits were not met, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2006-01-09
that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time limits were not met, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Vernon C. Kukes
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
Laura Roberson v. Donald Jessup
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely the presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely the presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
modification.[2] We conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
modification.[2] We conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Carmen L. Harrell
remand, again denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21
remand, again denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
Elmer No. 97-3007 2 Needham’s will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
Elmer No. 97-3007 2 Needham’s will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21