Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37811 - 37820 of 43311 for legal seperation.

[PDF] State v. William A.H.
was legally married to another man. Nos. 97-2363 97-2364 3 drug screening of William could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12892 - 2017-09-21

Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
a party fails to cite legal authority specifically supporting a proposition, we refuse to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition, Britany’s arguments are not supported by legal reasoning, and are therefore undeveloped. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107968 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(the fairness objective).”). With those legal standards in mind, the circuit court determined that a nearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033561 - 2025-11-06

[PDF] Shane M. Heimerl v. Waverly Beach, Inc.
a decision granting summary judgment if the trial court incorrectly decided legal issues or material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6320 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a reasonable conclusion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238199 - 2019-03-28

Virginia Wustrack v. Beverly Enterprises-Wisconsin, Inc.
as a reasonable judge might act, in accordance with the governing legal principles. See Kerans v. Manion Outdoors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15021 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-Morales sets forth in detail the legal standard for a new-factor sentence modification, but never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208330 - 2018-02-14

State v. Richard Brown
exists. The trial court erred, however, by misreading Serocki, and by applying the wrong legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10750 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rheuben McClain
evidentiary ruling so long as is was based on the applicable legal standards and in accordance with the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8232 - 2005-03-31