Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37811 - 37820 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 37811 - 37820 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C.P.
have increased. Taken in context, the record shows that the court was concerned with leaving Phillip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
have increased. Taken in context, the record shows that the court was concerned with leaving Phillip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. The restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158099 - 2017-09-21
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. The restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew R. Molzahn
—and our review of the record shows no concrete evidence of this—we conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3453 - 2017-09-19
—and our review of the record shows no concrete evidence of this—we conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert M. Balistreri v. City of Madison
are explained in detail and fully supported by his analysis and by the record submitted at the hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9724 - 2017-09-19
are explained in detail and fully supported by his analysis and by the record submitted at the hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9724 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case, the record does not show that Provenzano’s “substantial rights” were affected by her inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
case, the record does not show that Provenzano’s “substantial rights” were affected by her inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we will assume them to be true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32507 - 2008-04-22
the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we will assume them to be true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32507 - 2008-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
discovery of criminal activity. There is also no basis in the record for Matta’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
discovery of criminal activity. There is also no basis in the record for Matta’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable. There is no evidence in the record to suggest Schmidt’s efforts were not reasonable. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33449 - 2008-07-21
reasonable. There is no evidence in the record to suggest Schmidt’s efforts were not reasonable. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33449 - 2008-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the on-the-record explanation required when a trial court exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2012-08-01
the on-the-record explanation required when a trial court exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2012-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
because the record was devoid of any reference to Kelm’s training or experience at visual speed detection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51291 - 2010-06-21
because the record was devoid of any reference to Kelm’s training or experience at visual speed detection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51291 - 2010-06-21