Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37831 - 37840 of 64762 for divorce records/1000.

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
determination of egregiousness is supported by the facts of record and are thorough. There would be no good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

Terrence J. Woods v.
as discipline for consenting to a settlement of a client’s case on the record without first having discussed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17260 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
§ 704.27). Further, the record does not support the court’s reconsideration determination that Hanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21

State v. Roland A. Smart
in the record of these reduced sentences occurring is a few brief comments by the circuit court. Assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31

State v. Arturo Melendez
of the fact that Melendez had a prior felony and misdemeanor record. Melendez also had a more serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31

State v. James Jagodinsky
clarified for the record that the prosecutor (and defense counsel) had a detailed juror list that would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James M. Heaton v. Michael W. Mountin
. The status of the record does not permit us to make that determination; the issue of implied permission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15516 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
as untimely, the record reflects that the court did hold a motion hearing on June 24, 2008. We presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the Criminal Complaint, through the arguments that were presented. And I … find from reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130755 - 2014-12-01

[PDF] State v. David W. Janke
. See Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56. Because the facts of the record do not support Janke’s Franks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19