Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37831 - 37840 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 37831 - 37840 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Darren E. Brookins
in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case, the record does not show that Provenzano’s “substantial rights” were affected by her inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
case, the record does not show that Provenzano’s “substantial rights” were affected by her inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we will assume them to be true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32507 - 2008-04-22
the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we will assume them to be true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32507 - 2008-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
discovery of criminal activity. There is also no basis in the record for Matta’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
discovery of criminal activity. There is also no basis in the record for Matta’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
County of Sauk v. Jammie M. Douglas
be preserved” without citing to anything in the record to support the assertion. While the State agrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6274 - 2017-09-19
be preserved” without citing to anything in the record to support the assertion. While the State agrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6274 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David A. Clark v. Gary R. McCaughtry
than the trial court, and our review is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14507 - 2017-09-21
than the trial court, and our review is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher S. Oglesby
show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for the sentence in the record. State v. Petrone, 161
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5299 - 2005-03-31
show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for the sentence in the record. State v. Petrone, 161
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5299 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
into the record. The report had been prepared for an earlier CHIPS proceeding. Among other things, the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47843 - 2010-03-15
into the record. The report had been prepared for an earlier CHIPS proceeding. Among other things, the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47843 - 2010-03-15
State v. Michael G. Kinch
whereby the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and are considered together for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31
whereby the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and are considered together for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31
09AP1379 State v. Eric D. Genge
collection when the record was ‘teeming’ with substantial reasons not to extend probation to compel payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19
collection when the record was ‘teeming’ with substantial reasons not to extend probation to compel payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19