Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
State v. Alvernice O. Sellers
the case fairly because Sellers is black. However, when the circuit court told Williams that she should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
the case fairly because Sellers is black. However, when the circuit court told Williams that she should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
Luann Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance Board
Wisconsin case law explaining that “‘[m]ere uncorroborated hearsay or rumor does not constitute substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin case law explaining that “‘[m]ere uncorroborated hearsay or rumor does not constitute substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6093 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marvin C. Seay
2002 WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-3490-CR 00-3530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-3490-CR 00-3530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
discretion to dismiss based on all of the facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 The parties stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
in the instant case, Barnes’s probation in the prior case was revoked. Barnes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the applying officer acted in bad faith or with reckless disregard in this case, and thus has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42482 - 2014-09-15
that the applying officer acted in bad faith or with reckless disregard in this case, and thus has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42482 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08
, 317 Wis. 2d 161, 765 N.W.2d 794. During the plea colloquy in this case, the court did not mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123008 - 2014-10-08