Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 83344 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
Newport Condominium Association, Inc. v. Concord-Wisconsin, Inc.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8835 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rick Keiting v. Mike Skauge
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9529 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9529 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1786
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1786
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
Frontsheet
2012 WI 18 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP2326-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78956 - 2012-02-29
2012 WI 18 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP2326-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78956 - 2012-02-29