Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 62401 for child support.
Search results 37851 - 37860 of 62401 for child support.
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
directly or specifically” to prior convictions supporting a finding of habitual criminality. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
directly or specifically” to prior convictions supporting a finding of habitual criminality. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
, a knife, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 941.23. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
, a knife, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 941.23. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
CA Blank Order
that twenty-three-year-old Kienast committed the crimes to support his long-time drug habit, had virtually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
that twenty-three-year-old Kienast committed the crimes to support his long-time drug habit, had virtually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
be supported by a statute of limitations or res judicata defense. We disagree. Section 893.53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14372 - 2005-03-31
be supported by a statute of limitations or res judicata defense. We disagree. Section 893.53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14372 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
battery. The court reasonably chose to give little weight to Saldana’s employment history, his support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
battery. The court reasonably chose to give little weight to Saldana’s employment history, his support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Hans C.
not exercised the appropriate parenting that was required. They determined that the facts supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7214 - 2005-03-31
not exercised the appropriate parenting that was required. They determined that the facts supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7214 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a telephonic affidavit in support of the warrant, which was issued by a court commissioner later that evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
a telephonic affidavit in support of the warrant, which was issued by a court commissioner later that evening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
insufficient because it is utterly lacking in factual support: no contract has been produced, nor its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
insufficient because it is utterly lacking in factual support: no contract has been produced, nor its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
State v. Robert J. Ehmke
that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. More specifically, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15731 - 2005-03-31
that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. More specifically, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15731 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James F. Neil
not affect our conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to support a jury finding that Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21
not affect our conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to support a jury finding that Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21