Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37871 - 37880 of 57351 for id.
Search results 37871 - 37880 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for purposes of a Fourth Amendment search must be ‘unequivocal and specific.’” Id., ¶46 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
for purposes of a Fourth Amendment search must be ‘unequivocal and specific.’” Id., ¶46 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
to Third Person for Negligent Performance of Undertaking” is not limited to those facts. Id. at ¶56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2629 - 2005-03-31
to Third Person for Negligent Performance of Undertaking” is not limited to those facts. Id. at ¶56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2629 - 2005-03-31
Allen R. Radtke, Jr. v. East Mequon Business Park Limited Partnership
discretion. See id. at 89, 440 N.W.2d at 828. The weighing of the various considerations is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10395 - 2005-03-31
discretion. See id. at 89, 440 N.W.2d at 828. The weighing of the various considerations is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tee & Bee, Inc.
irrelevant. See id. at 415, 588 N.W.2d at 255. Finally, the C&S decision held that excluding evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13691 - 2005-03-31
irrelevant. See id. at 415, 588 N.W.2d at 255. Finally, the C&S decision held that excluding evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13691 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the objectives and factors considered, which will vary from case to case. Id., ¶¶40-43. Ultimately, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202614 - 2017-11-16
the objectives and factors considered, which will vary from case to case. Id., ¶¶40-43. Ultimately, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202614 - 2017-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
been drinking at home and was not drunk. The deputy agreed he “d[id]n’t know at this point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
been drinking at home and was not drunk. The deputy agreed he “d[id]n’t know at this point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id., ¶17. Plain meaning can be discerned not only from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id., ¶17. Plain meaning can be discerned not only from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
State v. Isaac Hughes
of that controlled substance with intent to sell; and 3) simple possession of that controlled substance. Id., 382
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3304 - 2005-03-31
of that controlled substance with intent to sell; and 3) simple possession of that controlled substance. Id., 382
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3304 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Myers
enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. Id. Once a person consents to the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9006 - 2005-03-31
enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. Id. Once a person consents to the primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9006 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
during a probation revocation proceeding. Id. at 506-07, 516-18. The court then went on to fashion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31760 - 2008-02-06
during a probation revocation proceeding. Id. at 506-07, 516-18. The court then went on to fashion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31760 - 2008-02-06