Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63311 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63311 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Norman L. Dismuke
). He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5551 - 2017-09-19
). He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5551 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence modification. Kuykendoll claims that the circuit court: (1) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32620 - 2008-05-05
motion for sentence modification. Kuykendoll claims that the circuit court: (1) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32620 - 2008-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
credit. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32620 - 2014-09-15
credit. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment also represented that MHP was a joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65160 - 2014-09-15
affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment also represented that MHP was a joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65160 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment also represented that MHP was a joint venture between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65160 - 2011-05-31
affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment also represented that MHP was a joint venture between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65160 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
Brockdorf’s motion. Because the October 3, 2003 statement was non- custodial and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
Brockdorf’s motion. Because the October 3, 2003 statement was non- custodial and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
Brockdorf’s motion. Because the October 3, 2003 statement was non-custodial and voluntary, it was admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
Brockdorf’s motion. Because the October 3, 2003 statement was non-custodial and voluntary, it was admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred in denying his motions because: (1) he was “in custody” at the time he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
that the circuit court erred in denying his motions because: (1) he was “in custody” at the time he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
State v. Richard A. Lange
. Richard A. Lange appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4420 - 2005-03-31
. Richard A. Lange appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4420 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
motion to withdraw his plea or, in the alternative, for resentencing. Montriel contends that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
motion to withdraw his plea or, in the alternative, for resentencing. Montriel contends that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31