Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2014AP276-CR 2 motion to suppress evidence seized following a warrantless entry into his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
No. 2014AP276-CR 2 motion to suppress evidence seized following a warrantless entry into his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
by serving a motion upon the parties as provided in [Wis. Stat. §] 801.14. No. 2020AP1634-CQ 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295046 - 2020-12-02
by serving a motion upon the parties as provided in [Wis. Stat. §] 801.14. No. 2020AP1634-CQ 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295046 - 2020-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Barwick was charged with eleven crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218619 - 2018-09-05
denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Barwick was charged with eleven crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218619 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Linsmeyer’s motion to enforce a physical placement order and ordered Linsmeyer to pay his former spouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301683 - 2020-11-05
Linsmeyer’s motion to enforce a physical placement order and ordered Linsmeyer to pay his former spouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301683 - 2020-11-05
Frontsheet
the conviction. ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31776 - 2008-02-06
the conviction. ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31776 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
WI 10
2 ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31776 - 2014-09-15
2 ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31776 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence as well as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
se, contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence as well as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence as well as his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
se, contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence as well as his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19