Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of physical placement based upon his stipulation in a family law action that he would have no custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749464 - 2024-01-09
of physical placement based upon his stipulation in a family law action that he would have no custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749464 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals the postconviction court’s denial of his postconviction motion. ¶2 Carter contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192656 - 2017-10-13
also appeals the postconviction court’s denial of his postconviction motion. ¶2 Carter contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192656 - 2017-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
) and 939.62 (2007-08).[1] Pugh also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47043 - 2010-02-16
) and 939.62 (2007-08).[1] Pugh also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47043 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47043 - 2014-09-15
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47043 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 18
, Justice Prosser filed motions for recusal of every member of this court. A motion for recusal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92933 - 2014-09-15
, Justice Prosser filed motions for recusal of every member of this court. A motion for recusal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92933 - 2014-09-15
Order-SC
) (a)." It requested that "appropriate discipline be imposed."[1] In response, Justice Prosser filed motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92933 - 2013-02-12
) (a)." It requested that "appropriate discipline be imposed."[1] In response, Justice Prosser filed motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92933 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
as the orders denying their motions for postjudgment relief.[2] Their appellate brief, however, is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
as the orders denying their motions for postjudgment relief.[2] Their appellate brief, however, is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Vargas appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her child custody petition pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030511 - 2025-10-29
Vargas appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her child custody petition pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030511 - 2025-10-29