Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3791 - 3800 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53325 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53325 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
following a trial to the court, wherein Sileno was found guilty of possession of a No. 2007AP2955-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33865 - 2014-09-15
following a trial to the court, wherein Sileno was found guilty of possession of a No. 2007AP2955-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33865 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when denying his motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2010-11-01
that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when denying his motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2010-11-01
State v. Gary L. Everts
into a locked vehicle, all as a party to a crime and a repeat offender. Everts argues that his trial defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5745 - 2005-03-31
into a locked vehicle, all as a party to a crime and a repeat offender. Everts argues that his trial defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5745 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53325 - 2010-08-16
that the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53325 - 2010-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ยง 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
. ยง 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely the presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely the presumptive mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vernon C. Kukes
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
Laura Roberson v. Donald Jessup
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31

