Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Schams Joint Revocable Trust by David F. Schams v. William M. Evans
exercised its discretion in awarding attorney fees in this case. Punitive Damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14841 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion in awarding attorney fees in this case. Punitive Damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14841 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24926 - 2017-09-21
the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 167, 868 N.W.2d 124. ¶7 The issue in this case was recently addressed by our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
. 2d 167, 868 N.W.2d 124. ¶7 The issue in this case was recently addressed by our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kelso
in State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 446, 447, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991), a case we discuss in more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8685 - 2017-09-19
in State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 446, 447, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991), a case we discuss in more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8685 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not determinative. The present case does not involve a sick leave or similar account. Rather, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157536 - 2017-09-21
is not determinative. The present case does not involve a sick leave or similar account. Rather, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157536 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis Jones
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1002-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1002-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12322 - 2005-03-31