Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37921 - 37930 of 64084 for records/1000.
Search results 37921 - 37930 of 64084 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
).” The record contains a “Writ of Certiorari” that was signed by the circuit court on March 18, 2009. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56175 - 2010-11-01
).” The record contains a “Writ of Certiorari” that was signed by the circuit court on March 18, 2009. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56175 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
Secura Insurance Company v. Todd Mark
submission.” The Marks claim that they should have been permitted to contest damages at trial. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13702 - 2014-09-15
submission.” The Marks claim that they should have been permitted to contest damages at trial. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James C. Smith
improperly based its finding on facts not in the record when it referred to the 1978 incidents. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
improperly based its finding on facts not in the record when it referred to the 1978 incidents. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Waushara County Department of Human Services v. Jacob A.S.
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2140 - 2017-09-19
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2140 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercised its sentencing discretion by failing to acknowledge Pearson’s apology on the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30453 - 2014-09-15
exercised its sentencing discretion by failing to acknowledge Pearson’s apology on the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30453 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph Anthuber v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company
decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9083 - 2017-09-19
decision, “there should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9083 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addressing those issues. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529234 - 2022-06-07
addressing those issues. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529234 - 2022-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the on-the-record explanation required when a trial court exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
the on-the-record explanation required when a trial court exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
William P. Fischer v. Andray A. Zhurbas
that there are no facts of record that support an element on which the opposing party has the burden of proof. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15071 - 2017-09-21
that there are no facts of record that support an element on which the opposing party has the burden of proof. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15071 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
to Polich’s credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15019 - 2017-09-21
to Polich’s credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15019 - 2017-09-21