Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37921 - 37930 of 64114 for records/1000.

[PDF] State v. Bobby D. Swift
all other knowledge of the drugs. Based on this record, we conclude that there is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10685 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
of the requirements for reinstatement. The referee said the record established by clear, satisfactory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179285 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we summarily affirm the judgment of the circuit court. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616598 - 2023-02-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
records and proceedings for all proper purposes. This is particularly true when the records are part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105398 - 2017-09-21

Is a judge required, after a contested election, to recuse himself or herself from contested matters involving a former campaign manager?
sub. (4) may disclose on the record the basis of the judge’s recusal and may ask the parties
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19270 - 2005-08-07

State v. Philip P. Sheahan
to demonstrate a misuse of discretion, a defendant must show that the record contains an unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
as to whether Kosky’s taillights were on is evident on the video recording of the stop. The video depicts two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40563 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and the record, No. 2017AP1170-CR 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210464 - 2018-04-04

COURT OF APPEALS
, this court released Cherry, which discussed the on-the-record explanation required when a trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24

State v. Barry Bartle
of the sentence is consistent with the record established at sentencing. See State v. Wuensch, 69 Wis.2d 467, 480
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31