Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37931 - 37940 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 37931 - 37940 of 83320 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
not be applied retroactively, and because Riverside does not apply when the defendant, as in the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
not be applied retroactively, and because Riverside does not apply when the defendant, as in the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
-CR 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 81
2010 WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1990-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50273 - 2010-06-29
2010 WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1990-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50273 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435186 - 2021-10-06
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435186 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Dwight J.
. Case law interpreting the statute has limited the type of information that can be adduced about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3898 - 2017-09-20
. Case law interpreting the statute has limited the type of information that can be adduced about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3898 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06