Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 83973 for case search.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 83973 for case search.
Door County v. Earl F. Lindsay and Eleanor C. Lindsay
for further proceedings. The facts giving rise to this case are stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8327 - 2005-03-31
for further proceedings. The facts giving rise to this case are stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for No. 2011AP1877-CR 2 summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for No. 2011AP1877-CR 2 summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Janusz v. Bryan J. Olen
complaint alleging slander. Janusz claims the trial court erred in granting the motion because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14085 - 2014-09-15
complaint alleging slander. Janusz claims the trial court erred in granting the motion because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14085 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
court judgment denying his motion to remand the case for further administrative proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19
court judgment denying his motion to remand the case for further administrative proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Corey O. Mackin
Case No. 04-1890-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
Case No. 04-1890-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
for the indigent when the State Public Defender’s office must contract out cases to private counsel? ANSWER
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237546 - 2019-03-13
for the indigent when the State Public Defender’s office must contract out cases to private counsel? ANSWER
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237546 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109014 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2013AP669 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106033 - 2017-09-21
at No. 2013AP669 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106033 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2008-02-11
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2008-02-11