Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 43284 for legal seperation.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27

[PDF] Julaine M. Kinnard v. Peter R. Kinziger
the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. Burkes v. Hales, 165 Wis. 2d 585
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exceeded the legal limit, the fact-finder is not required to do so and must make this determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03

State v. Thomas S. Mayo
because counsel’s strategy was unsuccessful does not mean that counsel’s performance was legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24578 - 2006-03-28

Mary Judith Johnson v. Robert R. Johnson
the record, conclusions based on a proper legal standard, and the basis set forth in the record. Weiss v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14610 - 2005-03-31

Charles H. Smyser v. Western Star Trucks Corp.
previously noted that Smyser made no legal claims against Western Star until some ten months after he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3021 - 2005-03-31

Tamara S. Heibler v. Department of Workforce Development
, the statement, intertwined with the ALJ’s legal conclusion, correctly separates the impact of the collective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3757 - 2005-03-31

Barbara A. Schultz v. Roger D. Natwick, M.D.
and companionship, the need for tort victims to have access to adequate legal representation and deterrence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2240 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jose S. Soto
of newly discovered evidence. None of the allegedly new evidence satisfied the legal test outlined above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2005-03-31

Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
. § 48.426(3)(c) to unambiguously require that a circuit court evaluate the effect of a legal severance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31