Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 11-13-2023 Court Order
of Supreme Court FILED 11-13-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 11-13-2023 Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1113order.pdf - 2023-11-13
of Supreme Court FILED 11-13-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 11-13-2023 Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1113order.pdf - 2023-11-13
[PDF]
Circuit Courts of Wisconsin
judges who are assigned to hear cases when the need arises). The state also funds travel and training
/courts/resources/docs/cc.pdf - 2026-03-02
judges who are assigned to hear cases when the need arises). The state also funds travel and training
/courts/resources/docs/cc.pdf - 2026-03-02
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. W.
-2- Kenneth M. W. and the state entered into a consent decree in a delinquency case in 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
-2- Kenneth M. W. and the state entered into a consent decree in a delinquency case in 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jesse R.J.
the hearing on June 28, 1996. The only appearance was that of Dean Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12283 - 2017-09-21
the hearing on June 28, 1996. The only appearance was that of Dean Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case. The court did not err in entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25967 - 2017-09-21
had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case. The court did not err in entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25967 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09