Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Krohn
Judge Michael J. Barron entered the order denying the motion to suppress, the original judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14816 - 2017-09-21
Judge Michael J. Barron entered the order denying the motion to suppress, the original judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argue that the medical records filed in support of Goblirsch’s motion were insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369652 - 2021-05-25
argue that the medical records filed in support of Goblirsch’s motion were insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369652 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
Amy N. Varda v. Acuity
order 1 denying its motion for summary judgment in this personal injury case. Ellington argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18360 - 2017-09-21
order 1 denying its motion for summary judgment in this personal injury case. Ellington argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18360 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
the motion as one for summary judgment.[2] The trial court concluded that under Bablitch & Bablitch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
the motion as one for summary judgment.[2] The trial court concluded that under Bablitch & Bablitch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, 2009, the OLR filed a motion for default judgment based on Attorney Mauch's failure to file an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46134 - 2010-01-20
, 2009, the OLR filed a motion for default judgment based on Attorney Mauch's failure to file an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46134 - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authority to modify his sentences. The court denied the motion and he now appeals. ¶2 Doe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904998 - 2025-01-24
authority to modify his sentences. The court denied the motion and he now appeals. ¶2 Doe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904998 - 2025-01-24
State v. Donavan D. Theno
. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief on the grounds that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief on the grounds that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deonte D. Riley
properly granted Deonte D. Riley’s motion to suppress electronic surveillance evidence consisting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19225 - 2005-09-19
properly granted Deonte D. Riley’s motion to suppress electronic surveillance evidence consisting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19225 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James L. Larson
)(a) (2001-02). 1 Larson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5822 - 2017-09-19
)(a) (2001-02). 1 Larson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5822 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Wolfgram
an officer, as well as two orders denying his motions for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11435 - 2017-09-19
an officer, as well as two orders denying his motions for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11435 - 2017-09-19