Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 61985 for child support.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 61985 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
to accomplish the goals of the law, and Hechimovich does not cite authority supporting such a rule. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
to accomplish the goals of the law, and Hechimovich does not cite authority supporting such a rule. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Kahlon was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86700 - 2012-09-04
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Kahlon was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86700 - 2012-09-04
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the battery resulted in great bodily harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the battery resulted in great bodily harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call witnesses to support his alibi. We affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977155 - 2025-07-01
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call witnesses to support his alibi. We affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977155 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
prior to questioning, which, he argues, is the case here. ¶12 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35908 - 2014-09-15
prior to questioning, which, he argues, is the case here. ¶12 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35908 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
96, 105, 522 N.W.2d 542 (Ct. App. 1994). “If the court’s decision is supportable by the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
96, 105, 522 N.W.2d 542 (Ct. App. 1994). “If the court’s decision is supportable by the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
The TRC Design Group, Ltd. v. Lou Perrine
its findings of fact. He argues that there was no evidence, for instance, to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12981 - 2017-09-21
its findings of fact. He argues that there was no evidence, for instance, to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Kalk
a conflict of interest by virtue of the prior representation. In support of his motion, Kalk testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15469 - 2017-09-21
a conflict of interest by virtue of the prior representation. In support of his motion, Kalk testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse
dated July 11, 2000, in support of Rittenhouse’s postconviction motions stating that in the early part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3385 - 2017-09-19
dated July 11, 2000, in support of Rittenhouse’s postconviction motions stating that in the early part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3385 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not reasonably supported by the facts of record. Id. “Because the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141811 - 2017-09-21
not reasonably supported by the facts of record. Id. “Because the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141811 - 2017-09-21