Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth M. W.
. Kenneth M. W. and the state entered into a consent decree in a delinquency case in 1994. The decree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
. Kenneth M. W. and the state entered into a consent decree in a delinquency case in 1994. The decree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Thompson
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Ann Lovern appeals from an order in a postjudgment divorce case finding her in contempt of court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
Ann Lovern appeals from an order in a postjudgment divorce case finding her in contempt of court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
Judy Patricia Bushmaker v. Green Bay Diocese of The Roman Catholic Church
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31