Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37961 - 37970 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
State v. David T. Hall
of possession with intent to deliver cocaine in one case, and one count of possession with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19622 - 2005-09-19
of possession with intent to deliver cocaine in one case, and one count of possession with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19622 - 2005-09-19
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
State v. Alphonso Miller
The supreme court’s decision reversing our opinion in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17945 - 2005-04-27
The supreme court’s decision reversing our opinion in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17945 - 2005-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
court explained its reasons for the sentence as follows: Having heard the testimony in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93994 - 2014-09-15
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93994 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
Rule Order
a possibility of harm to unsuspecting individuals, such as the abandonment of a client's case or the loss
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21
a possibility of harm to unsuspecting individuals, such as the abandonment of a client's case or the loss
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to prosecute. The court declined to dismiss the case but barred Ryan’s permanency claim, dismissed the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190992 - 2017-09-21
to prosecute. The court declined to dismiss the case but barred Ryan’s permanency claim, dismissed the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190992 - 2017-09-21