Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37981 - 37990 of 68502 for did.
Search results 37981 - 37990 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
Marina Ludwigson v. Thomas Clarkin
she discovered that the Clarkins did not have title to the portion of the property that was sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12580 - 2017-09-21
she discovered that the Clarkins did not have title to the portion of the property that was sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12580 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alfred J. Spears
. Spears did not file a postconviction motion, but appeals directly from that judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
. Spears did not file a postconviction motion, but appeals directly from that judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP1275-CR 2 ¶2 Garrison contends that the trial testimony did not support the jury’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170946 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1275-CR 2 ¶2 Garrison contends that the trial testimony did not support the jury’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170946 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
was then revoked again and sentenced in February 1995. He did not pursue postconviction proceedings under RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
was then revoked again and sentenced in February 1995. He did not pursue postconviction proceedings under RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
Bruce Townsend v. Peter Glashauser
to a disputed strip of land by adverse possession.[1] He argues that the Townsends did not present sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20933 - 2006-01-17
to a disputed strip of land by adverse possession.[1] He argues that the Townsends did not present sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20933 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
that the presentence investigator lied to him about her sentencing recommendation, and did not interview his family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9055 - 2017-09-19
that the presentence investigator lied to him about her sentencing recommendation, and did not interview his family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9055 - 2017-09-19
State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
the court’s finding. ¶6 Furthermore, even if we were to conclude that Hornung did convey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31
the court’s finding. ¶6 Furthermore, even if we were to conclude that Hornung did convey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. McManus
that Minnesota advised, incorrectly in his view, that the agreement did not apply because McManus had already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4428 - 2005-03-31
that Minnesota advised, incorrectly in his view, that the agreement did not apply because McManus had already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4428 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry D. Faber
made to two sixteen-year-old girls did not violate this section. We affirm. At Faber’s preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14181 - 2005-03-31
made to two sixteen-year-old girls did not violate this section. We affirm. At Faber’s preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14181 - 2005-03-31
John C. O'Neill v. Arthur N. Krattiger
restrictions and covenants because the restriction at issue did not exist when the O’Neills entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31
restrictions and covenants because the restriction at issue did not exist when the O’Neills entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31