Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 381 - 390 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 381 - 390 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
] The specific language she directs us to is "[w]henever it orders sole or joint legal custody to parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
] The specific language she directs us to is "[w]henever it orders sole or joint legal custody to parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
. (b), if the court orders sole or joint legal custody under sub. (2), the court shall allocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
. (b), if the court orders sole or joint legal custody under sub. (2), the court shall allocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
. Kathleen and Scott were divorced on March 23, 1993. The parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12244 - 2005-03-31
. Kathleen and Scott were divorced on March 23, 1993. The parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12244 - 2005-03-31
Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
. Kathleen and Scott were divorced on March 23, 1993. The parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12243 - 2005-03-31
. Kathleen and Scott were divorced on March 23, 1993. The parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
divorced in July 2017. They stipulated to joint legal custody of the parties’ two minor children and a 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
divorced in July 2017. They stipulated to joint legal custody of the parties’ two minor children and a 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
] Francis’s sole issue on appeal is that the trial court erred by permitting a joint trial terminating both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
] Francis’s sole issue on appeal is that the trial court erred by permitting a joint trial terminating both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
not object to a joint trial at any time during the trial court proceedings. Indeed, the only motion made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14127 - 2014-09-15
not object to a joint trial at any time during the trial court proceedings. Indeed, the only motion made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
not object to a joint trial at any time during the trial court proceedings. Indeed, the only motion made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14126 - 2014-09-15
not object to a joint trial at any time during the trial court proceedings. Indeed, the only motion made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14126 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
] Francis’s sole issue on appeal is that the trial court erred by permitting a joint trial terminating both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
] Francis’s sole issue on appeal is that the trial court erred by permitting a joint trial terminating both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lori Bell v. Mae Neugart
to Jameson’s April 28, 2000 motion for stay, the court reasoned that the accounts were in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4397 - 2017-09-19
to Jameson’s April 28, 2000 motion for stay, the court reasoned that the accounts were in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4397 - 2017-09-19