Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 381 - 390 of 12696 for abusive.
Search results 381 - 390 of 12696 for abusive.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 charged as incidents of domestic abuse. Lockhart also appeals the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185373 - 2017-09-21
2 charged as incidents of domestic abuse. Lockhart also appeals the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185373 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
should be reduced because she is statutorily ineligible for the Substance Abuse Program in prison. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
should be reduced because she is statutorily ineligible for the Substance Abuse Program in prison. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the Substance Abuse Program in prison. We affirm. ¶2 Plunkett and two men, Michael Pagelsdorf and Anthony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
for the Substance Abuse Program in prison. We affirm. ¶2 Plunkett and two men, Michael Pagelsdorf and Anthony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles A. Bell
abuse in violation of § 948.03(2)(b), Stats.[5] The drug charges and the bailjumping charge were tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8125 - 2005-03-31
abuse in violation of § 948.03(2)(b), Stats.[5] The drug charges and the bailjumping charge were tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to property with a domestic abuse assessment. Solomon appeals the postconviction order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219535 - 2018-09-25
to property with a domestic abuse assessment. Solomon appeals the postconviction order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219535 - 2018-09-25
State v. Renee D.
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee D.
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5673 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5673 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee D.
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5672 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee D.
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5844 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5844 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee D.
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5670 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse of a fifth child; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5670 - 2005-03-31