Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 381 - 390 of 68502 for did.
Search results 381 - 390 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the lawyer did not raise the issue of his trial lawyer’s ineffectiveness. Townsend contends his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
the lawyer did not raise the issue of his trial lawyer’s ineffectiveness. Townsend contends his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy B. Sullivan
that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5784 - 2005-03-31
that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Johnson
. No. 2005AP331 5 position was that he did not want Attorney Henderson to request the instruction. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24960 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP331 5 position was that he did not want Attorney Henderson to request the instruction. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24960 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Peterson then testified that he understood and agreed with the MSA’s terms, as revised. He did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
. Peterson then testified that he understood and agreed with the MSA’s terms, as revised. He did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then testified that he understood and agreed with the MSA’s terms, as revised. He did not raise any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104582 - 2017-09-21
then testified that he understood and agreed with the MSA’s terms, as revised. He did not raise any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lorentz R. Roe v. Timothy Roe
of law. ¶2 We reach the following conclusions. (1) The trial court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15500 - 2017-09-21
of law. ¶2 We reach the following conclusions. (1) The trial court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Fosnow
withdrew the pleas after psychiatric evaluations did not support it. He then pleaded no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2148 - 2017-09-19
withdrew the pleas after psychiatric evaluations did not support it. He then pleaded no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2148 - 2017-09-19
Lorentz R. Roe v. Timothy Roe
We reach the following conclusions. (1) The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15500 - 2005-03-31
We reach the following conclusions. (1) The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15500 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel did not object to the testimony of the nurse who examined the child victim and because counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10
counsel did not object to the testimony of the nurse who examined the child victim and because counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10
State v. D. Weasler
did not constitute a search. We also determine that the circuit court did not take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31
did not constitute a search. We also determine that the circuit court did not take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31