Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 381 - 390 of 44730 for part.
Search results 381 - 390 of 44730 for part.
[PDF]
Paul Closser v. Town of Harding
rendered pursuant to § 236.43(1), STATS., vacating a part of a plat dedicated as a roadway providing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11619 - 2017-09-19
rendered pursuant to § 236.43(1), STATS., vacating a part of a plat dedicated as a roadway providing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11619 - 2017-09-19
Paul Closser v. Town of Harding
appeals a judgment rendered pursuant to § 236.43(1), Stats., vacating a part of a plat dedicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11619 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment rendered pursuant to § 236.43(1), Stats., vacating a part of a plat dedicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11619 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Bauer’s remarriage. The circuit court disagreed, ruling that the payments were part of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
Bauer’s remarriage. The circuit court disagreed, ruling that the payments were part of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
Steven Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
as a part of the wage contract under § 102.11(1)(e)? The Commission concluded that health insurance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16377 - 2017-09-21
as a part of the wage contract under § 102.11(1)(e)? The Commission concluded that health insurance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16377 - 2017-09-21
Steven Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
of value received in addition to monetary earnings as a part of the wage contract under § 102.11(1)(e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16377 - 2005-03-31
of value received in addition to monetary earnings as a part of the wage contract under § 102.11(1)(e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
disagreed, ruling that the payments were part of the property division and were not subject to termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104582 - 2017-09-21
disagreed, ruling that the payments were part of the property division and were not subject to termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104582 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: Todd K. Martens, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
: Todd K. Martens, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Douglas E. Stoneman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10712 - 2005-03-31
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Douglas E. Stoneman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10712 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Washington County: TODD K. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99529 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Washington County: TODD K. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99529 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven Pomplun v. Rockwell International Corporation
. MADDEN, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Fine, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9745 - 2017-09-19
. MADDEN, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Fine, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9745 - 2017-09-19