Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 56454 for n y c.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 56454 for n y c.
Eugene Nichols v. Jon Litscher
. Referring to the 45-day statutory deadline, the court explained that "[b]y requiring prisoners to submit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16369 - 2005-03-31
. Referring to the 45-day statutory deadline, the court explained that "[b]y requiring prisoners to submit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16369 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the warnings, Jackson said “yes,” and that he then asked Jackson if he wanted to talk and Jackson replied: “[Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57751 - 2010-12-13
the warnings, Jackson said “yes,” and that he then asked Jackson if he wanted to talk and Jackson replied: “[Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57751 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Ziebart
is limited to determining whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
is limited to determining whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy Ziebart
the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n.1. We will not overturn a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n.1. We will not overturn a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victor Naydihor
[O]n resentencing following a second conviction after retrial, or mere resentencing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
[O]n resentencing following a second conviction after retrial, or mere resentencing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel acknowledged: “[Y]ou have the facts presented before you as to how we’re going to deal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106010 - 2013-12-26
counsel acknowledged: “[Y]ou have the facts presented before you as to how we’re going to deal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106010 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
father. The trial court then said, “[N]ow you want me to order and declare that you are not the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252034 - 2020-01-16
father. The trial court then said, “[N]ow you want me to order and declare that you are not the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252034 - 2020-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and sending a bill to the second floor for this whole cost of the jury…. … [Y]ou’ve got a highly upset judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
and sending a bill to the second floor for this whole cost of the jury…. … [Y]ou’ve got a highly upset judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
WI App 59
court concluded that “[b]y undervaluing the properties the residual beneficiaries receive a benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194452 - 2018-08-23
court concluded that “[b]y undervaluing the properties the residual beneficiaries receive a benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194452 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had not touched her anywhere else, though she responded “[y]es” when asked specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749261 - 2024-01-10
had not touched her anywhere else, though she responded “[y]es” when asked specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749261 - 2024-01-10