Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 6141 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff who immediately responded to the scene testified that conditions were normal, he had no problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92478 - 2014-09-15
sheriff who immediately responded to the scene testified that conditions were normal, he had no problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92478 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the premises be sold by the sheriff at auction. WIS. STAT. §§ 842.13, 842.14(1) and 842.17(1). ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
that the premises be sold by the sheriff at auction. WIS. STAT. §§ 842.13, 842.14(1) and 842.17(1). ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are undisputed. Grant County Sheriff’s Deputy Andrew Smith stopped Hogan for a seatbelt violation. Hogan’s wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112449 - 2014-05-14
are undisputed. Grant County Sheriff’s Deputy Andrew Smith stopped Hogan for a seatbelt violation. Hogan’s wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112449 - 2014-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was analyzed. We affirm. ¶3 A sheriff’s deputy pulled Bethke over for speeding just after 1 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111132 - 2017-09-21
was analyzed. We affirm. ¶3 A sheriff’s deputy pulled Bethke over for speeding just after 1 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111132 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Arthur Edwards was a sheriff’s deputy for Clark County until he was discharged on May 29, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21
Arthur Edwards was a sheriff’s deputy for Clark County until he was discharged on May 29, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21
State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
of conviction. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
being escorted by a sheriff’s deputy. Davis’s trial counsel suggested the judge speak to the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
being escorted by a sheriff’s deputy. Davis’s trial counsel suggested the judge speak to the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
, hearing to suppress statements and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
, hearing to suppress statements and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
external hard drives during the execution of a search warrant at Christensen’s home. A sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353412 - 2021-04-06
external hard drives during the execution of a search warrant at Christensen’s home. A sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353412 - 2021-04-06