Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during the search of the billfold compartment of 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
during the search of the billfold compartment of 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 85
is reasonable and constitutional. Because the facts in this case meet the T.L.O. test, the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36455 - 2014-09-15
is reasonable and constitutional. Because the facts in this case meet the T.L.O. test, the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36455 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
preponderance of the evidence. Id. ΒΆ14 The seminal case setting forth the standard for a search on school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36455 - 2011-02-07
preponderance of the evidence. Id. ΒΆ14 The seminal case setting forth the standard for a search on school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36455 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Wilton Tye
that the absence of a sworn statement to support the search warrant in this case is a technical irregularity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17589 - 2017-09-21
that the absence of a sworn statement to support the search warrant in this case is a technical irregularity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the 1 The parties correctly note that this case technically involves two searches, rather than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247155 - 2019-09-24
to the 1 The parties correctly note that this case technically involves two searches, rather than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247155 - 2019-09-24
Frontsheet
to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases, State v. Johnson and State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66883 - 2011-06-28
to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases, State v. Johnson and State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66883 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
WI 49
in question was not enough to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66883 - 2014-09-15
in question was not enough to justify a protective search. In the circumstances present in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Schneck
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 92
not to resolve the first issue, and assume, without deciding, that a search or seizure occurred in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52412 - 2014-09-15
not to resolve the first issue, and assume, without deciding, that a search or seizure occurred in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52412 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, that a search or seizure occurred in this case that required authorization by a warrant. We therefore decide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52412 - 2010-07-19
, that a search or seizure occurred in this case that required authorization by a warrant. We therefore decide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52412 - 2010-07-19