Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181940 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion seeking a new trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181940 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
motion for postconviction relief. Phiffer claims he was denied a fair trial based No. 2004AP2141
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. Phiffer claims he was denied a fair trial based No. 2004AP2141
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carmen L. Harrell
remand, again denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21
remand, again denying his sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2005-06)2 motion. He claims that the trial court erred in summarily denying his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Hedy Rollins
both the judgment and the order. ¶2 Rollins’s argument on appeal is that the trial court deprived her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15552 - 2017-09-21
both the judgment and the order. ¶2 Rollins’s argument on appeal is that the trial court deprived her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15552 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
modification.[2] We conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
modification.[2] We conclude that the trial court was aware of the current applicable law, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
State v. Keith Edward Cooper
for postconviction relief. Cooper argues that the trial court twice erroneously exercised its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. Cooper argues that the trial court twice erroneously exercised its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vernon C. Kukes
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19