Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 72777 for we.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 72777 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allowed, renders that ordinance facially unconstitutional as well. We disagree and affirm. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79849 - 2014-09-15
allowed, renders that ordinance facially unconstitutional as well. We disagree and affirm. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
denied the motion. Mikulance appealed and we summarily affirmed the court’s denial of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
denied the motion. Mikulance appealed and we summarily affirmed the court’s denial of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jason W.T.
that he made to a police officer when questioned at his school. We conclude that Jason made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5038 - 2006-07-25
that he made to a police officer when questioned at his school. We conclude that Jason made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5038 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by videoconferencing over her objection. We conclude that pursuant to § 885.60(2)(d), the court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987257 - 2025-07-22
by videoconferencing over her objection. We conclude that pursuant to § 885.60(2)(d), the court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987257 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Brian B. Burke
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. We granted Brian Burke’s petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5549 - 2017-09-19
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. We granted Brian Burke’s petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5549 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a traffic stop of his vehicle. We conclude that the court properly denied Goldsworthy’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815924 - 2024-06-20
a traffic stop of his vehicle. We conclude that the court properly denied Goldsworthy’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815924 - 2024-06-20
State v. Crystal C. Parker
of deterrence. Because the record reveals that the trial court engaged in proper sentencing rationale, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2014-12-15
of deterrence. Because the record reveals that the trial court engaged in proper sentencing rationale, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2014-12-15
State v. Charles J. Burroughs
the sufficiency of the evidence on the “confinement” element of the kidnapping charge. We reject Burroughs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
the sufficiency of the evidence on the “confinement” element of the kidnapping charge. We reject Burroughs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
William Schwartz v. Jeffrey Schwartz
. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. PER CURIAM. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10094 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. PER CURIAM. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
JK Harris Financial Recovery Systems, LLC v. Department of Financial Institutions
, and it thus maintains that it need not be licensed under the cited statute. We accord the Division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25038 - 2017-09-21
, and it thus maintains that it need not be licensed under the cited statute. We accord the Division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25038 - 2017-09-21