Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38001 - 38010 of 81648 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 38001 - 38010 of 81648 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
State v. Edward Max Lewis
acts evidence is governed by a three-step test: The evidence must be admitted for an acceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20591 - 2017-09-21
acts evidence is governed by a three-step test: The evidence must be admitted for an acceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the undisputed law that the test for a valid Terry2 stop is “reasonableness.” This discussion is all fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
the undisputed law that the test for a valid Terry2 stop is “reasonableness.” This discussion is all fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald Rowley v. Robert M. Thompson
not mow over that line nor otherwise use the area. The test of hostile use was therefore met because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7507 - 2017-09-20
not mow over that line nor otherwise use the area. The test of hostile use was therefore met because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7507 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
marks and citation omitted). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70280 - 2014-09-15
marks and citation omitted). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Luegene Hampton
reasonably declined to submit the stocking masks for DNA or other scientific testing, that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9935 - 2017-09-19
reasonably declined to submit the stocking masks for DNA or other scientific testing, that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9935 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion of unlawful activity. In particular, Ritchey cites the undisputed law that the test for a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
suspicion of unlawful activity. In particular, Ritchey cites the undisputed law that the test for a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
)). The determination of reasonableness is a commonsense test. Id., ¶13. The crucial question is whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50820 - 2010-06-14
)). The determination of reasonableness is a commonsense test. Id., ¶13. The crucial question is whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50820 - 2010-06-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
seized from Hughes’s basement were tested because most of them were dried and stuck to each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29780 - 2014-09-15
seized from Hughes’s basement were tested because most of them were dried and stuck to each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29780 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Kypke v. Atterbury
)). The “reasonable diligence” test is objective. We therefore consider when a reasonable person in the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6270 - 2017-09-19
)). The “reasonable diligence” test is objective. We therefore consider when a reasonable person in the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6270 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
construction to a bad faith claim because doing so would nullify the “fairly debatable” test. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28475 - 2007-03-19
construction to a bad faith claim because doing so would nullify the “fairly debatable” test. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28475 - 2007-03-19