Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38011 - 38020 of 68202 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
whether, as a matter of law, the evidence is legally sufficient. State v. Aimee M., 194 Wis. 2d 282
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936466 - 2025-04-03

[PDF] Mews Companies, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
if the [trial] court has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15218 - 2017-09-21

State v. Vanessa D. Hughes
apply the law to those facts de novo. State v. Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 475, 569 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17249 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or local law.” But neither party in this appeal bases an argument on the content of this regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073615 - 2026-02-09

Mews Companies, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
will be sustained if the [trial] court has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15218 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
law judge and LIRC, the circuit court rejected Chrysler’s argument that its refusal to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135492 - 2017-09-21

State v. John Tomlinson, Jr.
-petitioner there were briefs by John J. Grau and Grau Law Office, Waukesha, and oral argument by John J. Grau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16444 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Doris A. Prissel v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
and clinic. She also argues that the trial court misinterpreted the law regarding informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5422 - 2017-09-19

2010 WI APP 162
that R.Z. was unavailable for trial and that the trial court applied “bad law.” Second, Baldwin argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56197 - 2010-12-19

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
conclude the trial court’s decision denying the Town’s motion to amend was based on an error of law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5688 - 2005-03-31