Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38021 - 38030 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 38021 - 38030 of 58245 for speedy trial.
State v. Curtis P. Johnson
. Stat. § 29.024(2)(e). ¶5 At the trial, the February 19, 2003 written statement was admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7409 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 29.024(2)(e). ¶5 At the trial, the February 19, 2003 written statement was admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213977 - 2018-06-05
from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213977 - 2018-06-05
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Faye P.
addresses without deference to the trial court's determination. In re Jason R.N., 201 Wis.2d 646, 650, 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9604 - 2017-09-19
addresses without deference to the trial court's determination. In re Jason R.N., 201 Wis.2d 646, 650, 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9604 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott I. Collett
on evaluating the restrictions on the defendant's freedom imposed by the program, we remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11082 - 2005-03-31
on evaluating the restrictions on the defendant's freedom imposed by the program, we remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph E. Heifort
, scrotum, penis, vagina or pubic mound of a human being.” WIS. STAT. § 939.22(19). ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6878 - 2017-09-20
, scrotum, penis, vagina or pubic mound of a human being.” WIS. STAT. § 939.22(19). ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6878 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Green’s expert was not going to testify at trial. The State argued on reconsideration that “[t]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
that Green’s expert was not going to testify at trial. The State argued on reconsideration that “[t]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Jeske
confinement and two years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
confinement and two years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
in the trial court, and now on appeal, that the City failed to abide by various laws regarding vacating streets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6656 - 2005-03-31
in the trial court, and now on appeal, that the City failed to abide by various laws regarding vacating streets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
therefore concluded that Stokes was competent to stand trial. During a subsequent competency hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514062 - 2022-04-26
therefore concluded that Stokes was competent to stand trial. During a subsequent competency hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514062 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision for the fleeing. Green appeals. The no-merit report first discusses “whether the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
supervision for the fleeing. Green appeals. The no-merit report first discusses “whether the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14