Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38031 - 38040 of 83973 for case search.
Search results 38031 - 38040 of 83973 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this defective-basement case, Michael D. and Ilene L. Dillhyon appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77158 - 2012-01-31
Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this defective-basement case, Michael D. and Ilene L. Dillhyon appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77158 - 2012-01-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
State v. Gary F. Boettcher
. We hold that this is not a Welsh case since Boettcher gave police consent to enter. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8821 - 2005-03-31
. We hold that this is not a Welsh case since Boettcher gave police consent to enter. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James J. Bartow
stated that field sobriety tests need not be done in every case; the purpose is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
stated that field sobriety tests need not be done in every case; the purpose is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
State v. Janice D.
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against Mayer stem from two separate lower-court cases. On Mayer’s motion, this court consolidated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74191 - 2014-09-15
against Mayer stem from two separate lower-court cases. On Mayer’s motion, this court consolidated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74191 - 2014-09-15
Barbara J. King v. "Jiffy Lube" Wisconsin
for evidentiary facts to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11197 - 2005-03-31
for evidentiary facts to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11197 - 2005-03-31
Clyde W. Harger v. Caterpillar, Inc.
2000 WI App 241 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2314 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 241 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2314 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93274 - 2013-02-20
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93274 - 2013-02-20