Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38031 - 38040 of 44743 for part.
Search results 38031 - 38040 of 44743 for part.
COURT OF APPEALS
) reads, in relevant part: [E]vidence of the amount of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79851 - 2012-03-21
) reads, in relevant part: [E]vidence of the amount of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79851 - 2012-03-21
[PDF]
State v. James A. Fischer
to open the car door.” The deputies used no force, threats or weapons. These actions on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14122 - 2014-09-15
to open the car door.” The deputies used no force, threats or weapons. These actions on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14122 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 116
opinion, are reasonably necessary. The referee said he recommended this in part to establish baseline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33769 - 2014-09-15
opinion, are reasonably necessary. The referee said he recommended this in part to establish baseline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roderick Lashawn Bogan
filed a response to the PSI, which provided, in pertinent part: 2. Offender Interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20554 - 2017-09-21
filed a response to the PSI, which provided, in pertinent part: 2. Offender Interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a), the provision under which Smithers was convicted, provides in relevant part: “No person may drive … a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
)(a), the provision under which Smithers was convicted, provides in relevant part: “No person may drive … a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
Donald Strassman v. Robert J. Muranyi
803.05(1), Stats., reads in pertinent part as follows: The plaintiff may assert any claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14678 - 2005-03-31
803.05(1), Stats., reads in pertinent part as follows: The plaintiff may assert any claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
injustice such as coercion, a genuine misunderstanding on the defendant’s part, an insufficient factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
injustice such as coercion, a genuine misunderstanding on the defendant’s part, an insufficient factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05
Certification
or not the welfare of the people, the public interest, will be served by sustaining a motion on the part of the city
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37030 - 2009-07-01
or not the welfare of the people, the public interest, will be served by sustaining a motion on the part of the city
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37030 - 2009-07-01
State v. Theodore A. Quartana
, there exists a two-part inquiry. First, was the person moved within the “vicinity?” Second, was the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12184 - 2005-03-31
, there exists a two-part inquiry. First, was the person moved within the “vicinity?” Second, was the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12184 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cori E. Jeffers
of remorse on the part of this defendant, I would not consider a jail term. I might consider simply a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12182 - 2005-03-31
of remorse on the part of this defendant, I would not consider a jail term. I might consider simply a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12182 - 2005-03-31