Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38041 - 38050 of 83396 for case search.
Search results 38041 - 38050 of 83396 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Rupert J. Loeffler v. Emma G. Loeffler
is that although counsel has justifiable cause for withdrawing from the case, he or she is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9281 - 2017-09-19
is that although counsel has justifiable cause for withdrawing from the case, he or she is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Benz
available to the driver whereas in this case, the State could not provide the intoxilizer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13221 - 2017-09-21
available to the driver whereas in this case, the State could not provide the intoxilizer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from environmental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70365 - 2014-09-15
to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from environmental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case, which were aggravated by Evers’ lengthy criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182829 - 2017-09-21
of the case, which were aggravated by Evers’ lengthy criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorothea Hackmann v. Randy Behm
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10042 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10042 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
account of the conversation. ¶12 While our supreme court rejected estoppel arguments in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
account of the conversation. ¶12 While our supreme court rejected estoppel arguments in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05