Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 69450 for as he.

Eric S. Brunner v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
denied Brunner’s claim to permanent partial disability benefits arising out of an injury he suffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15687 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
because Stephens concedes that he did not serve an authenticated summons along with his complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999354 - 2025-08-21

[PDF] Stacy L. Giraud v. Todd R. Giraud
in contempt because he had the capacity to earn $30,000 per year and he had not used that capacity to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14318 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gregory A. Mickelson
and order. ¶2 The underlying facts are undisputed. After Mickelson was arrested for OWI, he submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7005 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] William N. Ledford v. William Noland
that, as far as is shown by this record, the decision he wants reviewed has not yet been issued in final form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15683 - 2017-09-21

John Heineke v. Charlene Lunsmann
for lack of personal jurisdiction. He claims the trial court erred in concluding that Lunsmann’s lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15893 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jerry M. Brandt
. The postconviction motion alleged that Brandt’s trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to impeach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
disqualification of a judge when he or she “determines that, for any reason, he or she cannot, or it appears he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945829 - 2025-04-24

State v. Sterling Rachwal
gratification with an animal under § 944.17(2)(c), Stats., and if not, whether he is restricted to withdrawing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7948 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith A. Rudolph
conclude that Rudolph is judicially estopped from challenging a sentence to which he agreed, and insofar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26