Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 83973 for case search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 83973 for case search.
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011- 12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95945 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011- 12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95945 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ernest K. Knox
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0682-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12179 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0682-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
Michael Montey v. Steve's on Bluemound
Montey. The trial court agreed, explaining: [T]he Delvaux case controls, and the tavern can not be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15663 - 2005-03-31
Montey. The trial court agreed, explaining: [T]he Delvaux case controls, and the tavern can not be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
Display Promotions, Inc. v. DoveBid Valuation Services, Inc.
to conclude the transaction. ¶10 On reconsideration, the court concluded that the facts of this case do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19397 - 2005-08-30
to conclude the transaction. ¶10 On reconsideration, the court concluded that the facts of this case do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19397 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
Patricia A. Charette v. State
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8353 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8353 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13