Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 57395 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken facts or an erroneous view of law. Id.; Duffy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. However, we “review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986076 - 2025-07-24

COURT OF APPEALS
a person is a resident or member of the household.” Id. at 33-34. “[A]ll of the elements must combine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63591 - 2011-05-04

COURT OF APPEALS
measuring stick. Id. at 523. Here, the jury was instructed to use the “Broad Evidence Rule.”[2] That rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121333 - 2014-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion. See id., ¶28. ¶9 There are multiple factors the trial court should consider when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
satisfies this standard presents a question of law. Id., ¶33. If the facts do not constitute a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223851 - 2018-10-24

[PDF] NOTICE
of his or her training and experience? Id. ¶8 In reviewing the circuit court’s determination, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39047 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, therefore, refers only to actual authority.” Id. “[I]t is well-accepted, black-letter law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21

State v. Roger P. Barber
a retrial.” Id. at 2. The record was remitted to the circuit court on June 8, 1999. No further action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4992 - 2005-03-31

Dewey M. Purnell v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
arrive at the same conclusion as the agency. Id. Further, this court may infer that LIRC made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10998 - 2005-03-31