Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 49954 for our.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 49954 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Town of Delafield, 190 Wis. 2d 348, 353, 526 N.W.2d 822 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶8 Our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26
. Town of Delafield, 190 Wis. 2d 348, 353, 526 N.W.2d 822 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶8 Our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26
State v. Todd E. Crider
a windfall sentence credit without encountering the habitual offender enhanced penalty. Our decision today
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
a windfall sentence credit without encountering the habitual offender enhanced penalty. Our decision today
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to eliminate smoking” and that “[f]rom our discussion, it seems the issue occurs after the on-site staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016593 - 2025-09-30
to eliminate smoking” and that “[f]rom our discussion, it seems the issue occurs after the on-site staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016593 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Huppeler
court, and our review is limited to whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14235 - 2014-09-15
court, and our review is limited to whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14235 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05; 973.01(3g). No. 2020AP1461-CRNM 6 Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331814 - 2021-02-09
WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05; 973.01(3g). No. 2020AP1461-CRNM 6 Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331814 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying sentence modification motions. For example, in Harbor, our supreme court upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691620 - 2023-08-17
denying sentence modification motions. For example, in Harbor, our supreme court upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691620 - 2023-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
809.25(3). Our August 31, 2016 order held the motion in abeyance pending a decision in this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192500 - 2017-09-21
809.25(3). Our August 31, 2016 order held the motion in abeyance pending a decision in this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192500 - 2017-09-21
Annette D. Cary and Daniel D. Cary v. The City of Madison
legislative intent, we look to the plain language of the statute. If the statute is clear on its face, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10155 - 2005-03-31
legislative intent, we look to the plain language of the statute. If the statute is clear on its face, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10155 - 2005-03-31
Thomas L. Anderson v. State of Wisconsin Parole Commission
release. The State appeals the order. ¶6 On certiorari review, our review is identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7294 - 2005-03-31
release. The State appeals the order. ¶6 On certiorari review, our review is identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7294 - 2005-03-31