Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38071 - 38080 of 49954 for our.
Search results 38071 - 38080 of 49954 for our.
Robert A. Kron v. Harry Demorest
.” Kleinstick v. Daleiden, 71 Wis. 2d 432, 442, 238 N.W.2d 714 (1976). Based upon our deferential standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7271 - 2005-03-31
.” Kleinstick v. Daleiden, 71 Wis. 2d 432, 442, 238 N.W.2d 714 (1976). Based upon our deferential standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7271 - 2005-03-31
County of Iowa v. Brock T. Bilse
counter to our conclusion in State v. Wille that an officer is not required to administer sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15435 - 2005-03-31
counter to our conclusion in State v. Wille that an officer is not required to administer sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15435 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
. ¶13 Our independent review of the record shows that no written notice provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
. ¶13 Our independent review of the record shows that no written notice provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
. ¶13 Our independent review of the record shows that no written notice provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
. ¶13 Our independent review of the record shows that no written notice provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
first holding a hearing on his claim. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968543 - 2025-06-11
first holding a hearing on his claim. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968543 - 2025-06-11
State v. Thomas C. Holden
the conviction. Our confidence in the outcome is not undermined by the nondisclosure of information which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11183 - 2005-03-31
the conviction. Our confidence in the outcome is not undermined by the nondisclosure of information which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo. Ambrose v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15492 - 2017-09-21
—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo. Ambrose v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assessment that Harris’s response raises no issues of arguable merit. Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987058 - 2025-07-22
assessment that Harris’s response raises no issues of arguable merit. Our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987058 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Deborah A. Neas
documents does not undermine our confidence in Neas’s conviction. See State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
documents does not undermine our confidence in Neas’s conviction. See State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to police. ¶12 In light of our determination that it is not reasonably probable that the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15
to police. ¶12 In light of our determination that it is not reasonably probable that the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15