Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38071 - 38080 of 56178 for so.
Search results 38071 - 38080 of 56178 for so.
State v. Jose S. Soto
should have moved for a new hearing so Soto could have been represented by a non-biased attorney. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2011-03-31
should have moved for a new hearing so Soto could have been represented by a non-biased attorney. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2011-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We reverse the conviction only where the evidence “is so lacking in probative value and force
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
. We reverse the conviction only where the evidence “is so lacking in probative value and force
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
State v. Kevin Ryan
. Rawski. This is so because Ryan “relied upon a mental condition as an element of his defense” when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14519 - 2005-03-31
. Rawski. This is so because Ryan “relied upon a mental condition as an element of his defense” when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14519 - 2005-03-31
State v. Earl L. Diehl
A. Schwartz so indicate) JUDGES: Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9624 - 2005-03-31
A. Schwartz so indicate) JUDGES: Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9624 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luegene Antoine Hampton
. To prove prejudice, a defendant must show that counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
. To prove prejudice, a defendant must show that counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
considerations. It committed no error by doing so. Circuit courts have broad discretion in selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86520 - 2012-08-27
considerations. It committed no error by doing so. Circuit courts have broad discretion in selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86520 - 2012-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
an equal division of the parties’ season Badger sports tickets without a factual basis for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41956 - 2009-10-07
an equal division of the parties’ season Badger sports tickets without a factual basis for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41956 - 2009-10-07
[PDF]
WI App 52
whether an easement providing “a right of way for road purposes” was abandoned. Doing so, we turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266879 - 2020-09-14
whether an easement providing “a right of way for road purposes” was abandoned. Doing so, we turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266879 - 2020-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is “within 72 hours after the individual is taken into custody.” 2013 Wis. Act 158, § 14. So, the main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
is “within 72 hours after the individual is taken into custody.” 2013 Wis. Act 158, § 14. So, the main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Julie Ann Walberg v. St. Francis Home, Inc.
so, it examined Section 4234 and noted, "[i]t is obvious that this provision only reaches a case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18405 - 2017-09-21
so, it examined Section 4234 and noted, "[i]t is obvious that this provision only reaches a case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18405 - 2017-09-21