Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38081 - 38090 of 56178 for so.

COURT OF APPEALS
to establish deficient performance, a defendant must show that “counsel made errors so serious that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33008 - 2008-06-16

State v. Craig R. Nelson
indicated that it might take some time to get the marijuana ready. Nicole’s brother could not stay, so he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Charles Glynn
annual accounts, despite repeated requests to do so from the Veterans Administration Hospital where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17314 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael R.
Rawhide, so I cannot give an expert opinion on what Rawhide would offer. That would be more an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9173 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with the trial that day or whether he would be requesting a delay of the proceedings, and if so the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75746 - 2009-12-27

Gregory Gottsacker v. Julie A. Monnier
expressed their intent to operate under the Wisconsin Limited Liability Company Law. In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6180 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) whether the alleged conflict between the defendant and the attorney was so great that it likely resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-18

Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
defend itself.” Wis. Stat. § 655.27(5)(a)3. We must apply statutes so that every word is given meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15541 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alan Adin Randall
. If it is not so satisfied, it shall recommit him or her to the custody of the department. On May 25, 1990, a six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12115 - 2009-08-03

State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
and, in doing so, the supreme court determined that the OWI penalty enhancers did not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31