Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38091 - 38100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 38091 - 38100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated convictions, a suspended license, and was released on bond in misdemeanor cases. At his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29033 - 2007-05-15
intoxicated convictions, a suspended license, and was released on bond in misdemeanor cases. At his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29033 - 2007-05-15
State v. Lyle I. Dank
is not in any way relevant to this case ... [a]nd while its true that courts often allow evidence in even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
is not in any way relevant to this case ... [a]nd while its true that courts often allow evidence in even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consecutive to a sentence he was serving in connection with a conviction in a Dane County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
consecutive to a sentence he was serving in connection with a conviction in a Dane County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
, and he contends that his continued confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, 518, 453 N.W.2d 508 (Ct. App. 1990) (citation omitted). Probable cause “must be assessed on a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
, 518, 453 N.W.2d 508 (Ct. App. 1990) (citation omitted). Probable cause “must be assessed on a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
Certification
without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two different
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77892 - 2012-02-08
without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two different
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77892 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
lot.” This argument has no merit. The Neighbors have cited no Wisconsin cases that state the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32727 - 2014-09-15
lot.” This argument has no merit. The Neighbors have cited no Wisconsin cases that state the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32727 - 2014-09-15
State v. Oto Orlik
, but argues that we should continue to apply the case law that was in effect at the time of his trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31
, but argues that we should continue to apply the case law that was in effect at the time of his trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31