Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38091 - 38100 of 50200 for our.
Search results 38091 - 38100 of 50200 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a canine sniff of the vehicle for drugs. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
a canine sniff of the vehicle for drugs. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
State v. Raymond C. Williams
conclude that our disposition of Williams’ challenge to the admissibility of evidence that he abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12168 - 2005-03-31
conclude that our disposition of Williams’ challenge to the admissibility of evidence that he abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and that the agreement is enforceable under the statutory exceptions to the statute of frauds. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
and that the agreement is enforceable under the statutory exceptions to the statute of frauds. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
-sentencing issues in our consideration of Burns’s alleged reason (ineffective assistance) for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32547 - 2008-04-28
-sentencing issues in our consideration of Burns’s alleged reason (ineffective assistance) for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32547 - 2008-04-28
CA Blank Order
meritorious issue. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145255 - 2015-07-28
meritorious issue. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145255 - 2015-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, CitiFinancial argues that it was entitled to summary judgment. Given our discussion and conclusions above, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131517 - 2014-12-10
, CitiFinancial argues that it was entitled to summary judgment. Given our discussion and conclusions above, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131517 - 2014-12-10
CA Blank Order
counsel was ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116671 - 2014-07-15
counsel was ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116671 - 2014-07-15
Hazel I. Wright v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
our discretion to reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial at which the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12404 - 2005-03-31
our discretion to reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial at which the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12404 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacques Gibson
in prison. We disagree. ¶15 The principles governing our review of a court’s sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14341 - 2005-03-31
in prison. We disagree. ¶15 The principles governing our review of a court’s sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fecke
be substantially probable upon retrial. Id. In either case, we will exercise our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
be substantially probable upon retrial. Id. In either case, we will exercise our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19